This is a link to an article that has been simmering in my head this past week.
http://beta-newsroom.lds.org/article/context-and-controversy-KUTV-handbook
Maybe because we live in the backyard of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints' headquarters, and the Church has a strong history and steady following here, we hear about Church related "news" on our regular news reports on TV. That, in and of itself, is a little weird to me. But it is what it is.
But I am getting awfully tired of hearing only about the supposed anti-gay agenda of the Church's leadership. Or the slanted view that Church teachings are causing gay people to want to commit suicide.
I am not saying that there are some young people, in particular, who identify themselves as gay who find the teachings of the Church uncomfortable. But if they are reading the Bible at all, this anti-gay-behavior teaching is, or at least should be, across Christianity. The Bible spells it out pretty plainly. As it does for other issues like, oh, I don't know, adultery, or fornication--that is pre-marital sex, or even spousal and child abuse. These are not issues solely reserved for Mormon leaders to preach about to their people. All Christianity should be vocally opposed to them.
So why do we only hear the negative? What about those folks who identify their same-sex attraction but choose not to act on it? IS that frustrating? I am sure it is. But, I'd imagine, it is the same kind of frustration for them as it is for my darling single girl friends who choose to be celibate because they haven't found a decent man to marry and share that part of their life with yet. Still, those virtuous and valiant women are going about their work, with school, careers, extended families and friends making a positive difference. Sure they get frustrated. But I haven't ever heard of one such woman who chose suicide over life, however frusted they are.
Why do news agencies rev up so much on this biased side of this issue, among others? Do they sell more papers, air time, commercial endorsements? People are already talking, so they needn't stir much up to make that happen.
I just thought--especially in light of this particular article--that there was not much real news in that particular event for anyone other than local church leadership. It is a new handbook of instructions. This was prepared to help us perform more efficiently in our callings, within our stewarships, and to become better disciples of Jesus Christ. Yet, the media warp it to another anti-gay standoff, unrecognizable from what I saw sitting in the meeting myself.
It is just another point of frustration for me. And I find myself less and less willing to put up with this kind of journalistic mismanagement. Too bad they can't stick to telling the real news and not making the reporting of it a polarizing shot.